Dear all,
I'm evaluating options to continue our classes online. I will be announcing shortly which of the available online teaching/conference platforms I will be using.
In the meantime, please find below an impromptu draft of my lecture for today.
Please use the "Follow" option/button and post comments (at the end of this post you have a button for that) should you have questions. I will be available from 16-18 h. to answer them in real time.
Until soon,
B. Ș.
LECTURE #4 (ONLINE)
THE REDISCOVERY OF MYTH
AND MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE
CONTINUITY
The main argument of
the course is that the major contributions to and innovations in, 20th c. art
in Britain and elsewhere in Western culture occur under the sign of irrationalism (i.e., a distrust of
reason and rationalism, intellectualism, logic and analysis, common sense etc.).
This stand was foreshadowed by the Romantic revolt against
reason/rationalism and materialism/the empirical (viz. the utilitarian,
pragmatic, and materialist bent of Western modernity).
Examples: Blake was a
mystical, prophetic artist and he saw Newton as an arch-villain whose
mechanistic rationalized account of the universal laws of physics he called
“single vision and Newton’s sleep”. Blake protested that there is no corporeal
existence, and “mental things alone are real”. In fact, all English Romantics
dwell in an inner universe of imagination and mystery, reverie, intuition,
empathy or melancholy, purged of the insufferable reason (Wordsworth called it
“our meddling intellect”) and free from the material.
LECTURE 4.
One such strand of
irrationalism in 20th-century Western thought and art is the rediscovery of irrationality in mythical imagination and in mystical
experience. The intellectual climate that proved influential in the
realm of the arts leading to a renewed awareness of the irrational included a
number of anthropological, theological, philosophical, psychoanalytical works
which reached the educated public in Britain and Europe.
One example of a work that
whetted the appetite for myth and non-Christian approaches to the divine was
the anthropological study by Sir James Frazer, The Golden Bough. It was
published from 1890-1915 in 12 successive volumes and in 1921 the one-volume
abridged edition came out, which, although heavily criticized by the experts,
was the text that became more readily available to non-specialized readers and
influenced the cultural elites. Frazer set out to conduct a minute comparative
survey and provide a (speculative) interpretation of the recurrent image or theme
(today you might call it an archetype) of the golden bough. His comparative
approach to diverse mythologies suggests that there may be one and the same
sacred story behind various myths from apparently unrelated cultures. It also
hints that the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ may be no more than one
of many variants of the same myth of the death and rebirth of nature, of the
(human) sacrifice required for a new cycle of life to begin and for fertility
to be restored.
Frazer discusses the nature of magic as embodied by
primitive/pagan mythology in relation to religion (Christian) and modern science.
Magic works by a misuse of the law of association, through similarity and
contiguity (proximity and/or contact). As opposed to magic, science can verify
its conclusions, its finds by induction of laws against reality. But both magic
and science believe in the existence of immutable impersonal laws governing
nature; they both use the laws of association/associative thinking in their
logical deductions and inferences. By contrast, religion believes that the
course taken by nature is elastic, unpredictable as dictated by the
unforeseeable powers of divinity that may change reality and produce unexpected
turns of events. In magic and science, the powers are subordinated to the human
will and knowledge (they can be predicted, controlled, and used), in religion
you can only propitiate, win over the grace/favors of the supernatural being to
whom you are inferior.
Frazer was not very sympathetic to mythology and the
mystical, he was a scientist with a rational, analytical, detached approach to
his object of study, which he felt was the product of superstitious, uneducated
minds that have not been exposed to the beneficial effects of science. Still,
Frazer’s book is an invaluable investigation of mythology especially since he
introduces comparative techniques and ventures beyond Classical mythology and
Christian faith into hitherto unstudied mythologies and religious beliefs.
In spite of the
controversy the work generated and of its unsympathetic critical reception
amongst other scholars, The Golden Bough inspired the creative literature
of the period. Frazer’s survey documented the complexity and wealth of mythical
representations of divinity, well beyond the Christian culture, and thus
stirred the imagination of many a writer. Examples include William Butler Yeats’
reference to the golden bough in his poem "Sailing to Byzantium", T.
S. Eliot’s acknowledged indebtedness to Frazer in the first note to his poem The
Waste Land, Robert Graves’ study on poetry, ritual, and myth, The White
Goddess (1948), where Frazer's concept of the royal sacrifice for the good
of the kingdom is adapted to the romantic idea of the poet's suffering for the
sake of his divine Muse. The substantial list of cultural personalities
influenced by Frazer’s book may also include writers like James Joyce, Ernest
Hemingway, David Herbert Lawrence, Ezra Pound, as well as psychoanalysts
Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung, the Cambridge ritualist anthropologists or comparatist
and myth critic Joseph Campbell.
Frazer’s contemporary,
German theologian and scholar of comparative religious studies Rudolph Otto,
had a totally different attitude towards religious experience and human
representations of the divine. He, too, set out to study religious culture and imagination
through a scientific and comparative methodology, but, unlike Frazer, he was
not unsympathetic to his object of study.
Influence on Paul Tillich and Mircea Eliade (viz. The Sacred and the Profane).
His most influential
book is Das Heilige - Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und
sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen (1917, translated into English as The Idea of the Holy: An
Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation
to the Rational, 1923), which claims that a rationalist approach is
counter-productive in understanding divinity/the sacred. He believes that
orthodox religious views have been reduced to a merely rational account of
divinity which is insufficient and inappropriate for understanding the true
nature of the divine. Therefore, Otto sets out to propose that the irrational is,
in fact, the essence of the divine. This is not an entirely new notion in the
Christian tradition, as one of the Fathers of the Christian Church (Tertulian) famously
pronounced “Credo quia absurdum est”
(I believe because it is absurd). He may have meant that if something makes sense to the limited human understanding, then it
cannot be divine. If we can produce a perfectly intelligible explanation of
divinity, then it must be unfaithful to the incommensurability and, therefore,
the incomprehensibility of the divine, which no human intellect can contain. But
if something looks absurd to us and incomprehensible, then it must surely come
from God.
To demonstrate this,
Otto invokes the old concept of arethon (Gk. ‘ineffable’),
unspeakable reality and proposes the “numinous” (from Lat. numen meaning "divine will or power"), an awe-inspiring presence of a non-representational supernatural
reality, devoid of a definite shape. He argues that the divine cannot be
perceived, therefore the holy is more of a sentiment, a sense of the sacred
best captured by the phrase mysterium tremendum, a feeling of
grandeur, of infinite energy, of an implacable and incomprehensible will (omnipotence).
The mystery is
nurtured by the very ineffability of the numinous. Yet, Otto posits that the
numinous can be somehow “transmitted”, though a more apt way of putting it
would be to say that it can only be “awakened… induced, incited, and aroused”.
The direct expression, the passing from mind to mind of this peculiar form of
consciousness can only be done by means of empathy, intuition or communion (“a
penetrative imaginative sympathy with what passes in the other person’s mind”).
There are also indirect means of expressing this inexpressible numinous inner
reality by means of a host of images of holy dread or fear, as well as by the
holy languages and vocabularies of religious ceremonies.
But Otto’s analysis
becomes especially relevant to literature when he talks about “means by which
the numinous is expressed in art”. Unsurprisingly, given the long cultural
tradition of the notion, Otto feels the artistic mode best equipped to express
the numinous is “the sublime” which he associates with the symbolic
architecture of Stonehenge or the pyramids. One is reminded both of Hegel’s
discussion of the symbolic nature of Egyptian architecture in his (Lectures on) Aesthetics, as well as of
Edmund Burke’s treatise On the Sublime and the Beautiful (1756)
where the English thinker claims, like Otto, that the sublime is the human
reaction to the incomprehensible experience of the transcendental, something that
goes beyond our understanding, beyond the quantitative and qualitative limits
of our human condition. The two authors also coincide in believing that the
transcendental can only be experienced through feelings of awe or fear (horror
sacrum). Otto also mentions the “magical” and the Gothic as
predilect modes of artistically expressing the numinous, but he insists that
art has more direct means of representing the numinous, and these are Darkness
(more precisely, the crepuscular or “semi-darkness”), Silence (euphemía or avoidance of inappropriate
language), and, for oriental art, Emptiness.
Another important charge
against reason and rationalism came from psychoanalysis, a discipline which
impacted artistic and critical circles in the West considerably. Psychoanalysis
proposed, among other things, that the human mind is dominated by the
irrational mechanisms of the unconscious which are at play in all cultural
fields, including religion, myth, and the arts. Although chiefly concerned with
the individual unconscious, Sigmund Freud was not
oblivious of the irrational nature of cultural practices such as mysticism, myth-making,
and religion. He published Totem and
Taboo (1913) and Moses and Monotheism
(1939) where, like Frazer, he also broaches the question of regicide from the
perspective of the Oedipus complex (patricide, therefore), of trauma and of
guilt.
Freud admitted to
having been prompted to write Totem and
Taboo by the works of James Frazer and of Carl Gustav Jung,
another famous and influential personality who undertook to study the sacred.
Jung proposed a larger explanation of the psyche than Freudian psychoanalysis,
which was his starting point. To that effect he resorted to the notion of the “collective
unconscious” and postulated that this type of irrational but trans-individual
unconscious activity takes forms which he called “archetypes”. Archetypes are
innate (part of racial memory) and internal (i.e., not available to our
sense-perceptions in the external world), but they are the structuring psychic principles
behind the symbolic manifestations that become available to us. Like Otto, Jung
found these mental manifestations to be indeterminate, elusive, ineffable. An
archetype is “an irrepresentable unconscious, pre-existent form that seems to
be part of the inherited structure of the psyche and can therefore manifest
itself spontaneously anywhere, at any time”.
The major archetypes that
Jung talks about include the ego (the rational and willful core of one’s
consciousness manifested through images, metaphors, themes), the shadow (the
dark, negative, repulsive part of the unconscious), the persona (a
fragment of the collective unconscious superimposed on the individual psyche), the
animus - anima pair by which Jung explains the human psyche to be
bi-sexual (the core of an individual’s unconscious is the principle of the
opposite gender—anima for a male, animus for a female—which we project
onto the outside world), the child (preconscious of the collective soul), the spirit (the opposite of the child and represented as
a wise old man), the androgene (containing both sides/principles/energies of
the world), the self (a totalizing representation of both the conscious
and the unconscious and a harmonizing of contraries).
Jung was an avid
student of myth(ologies), of the esoteric traditions, and of western and
eastern mysticism and his thoughts on these matters became influential in England after the publication in 1916 of the English
translation of his Psychology of the Unconscious (Wandlungen und
Symbole der Libido) and then again starting with the 1930s. In fact, Jung
and English literature acted as reciprocal influences: like Freud, Jung drew
some of his intuitions and found confirmation in Shakespeare’s dramas (e.g., Hamlet,
Macbeth) and he tried his hand at a… Jungian interpretation of Joyce’s Ulysses.
D. H. Lawrence confessed to being impressed by Jung’s work and so were literary
critics like Herbert Read and Maud Bodkin.
Starting with the 1950s, a renewed interest in myth grew in the United
States and, generally, in the English speaking literary world with the help of
literary critics like Joseph Campbell (The Hero with a Thousand Faces,
1946, The Masks of God, 1959-1967) and Northrop Frye (Anatomy of
Criticism, 1957) or philosophers like Ernst Cassirer (Language as Myth,
1953). In conclusion, the more popular contributions of anthropology, the comparative
study of religions, and psychoanalysis/Jungianism, together with literary
criticism and philosophy have sparked and entertained a constant fascination
with the world of myth and mystical imagination which lay beyond the reaches of
our rationalizations. Throughout the century, writers kept tapping onto the
notion that literature might be a modern(ist) avatar for the myth-making
creativity of the human imagination which challenges modern man’s rationalist
and materialist understanding of the world. The next (our fifth) lecture will
be looking at some examples of twentieth-century writing in this category.
Suggested readings:
Steven Connor, “Modernity and Myth”, The Cambridge History of
Twentieth-Century English Literature, edited by Laura Marcus and Peter
Nicholls, Cambridge University Press, 2008, pages 251-268.